Rss Feed
Facebook button
Reddit button
Delicious button

Apple reinvents photocasting in iLife ‘06

“Eigen lof stinkt” as they say in Dutch, but who told you back in August of 2005 that RSS + images made sense (‘Photofeed: image podcasting’)?

A major new feature of iLife ‘06 is what Apple calls “Photocasting.” Described as podcasting for photos, photocasting makes it possible to share photos over the Internet using one mouse-click. The photos are updated to your .Mac account, where users can subscribe to them using Really Simple Syndication (RSS).
from macworld.com

and

Take Photocasting, for instance. A brand-new feature in iPhoto 6, it lets you share full-resolution photos with friends and family who subscribe via an email invitation you send using your .Mac Mail account. As you update photos in a Photocast album, they appear in your subscribers’ iPhoto libraries automatically — ready to print or add to iPhoto books, calendars, or greeting cards. And anyone can subscribe to your Photocasts: even if they don’t have iPhoto, they can still access your photos via any RSS-compatible web browser.
from www.apple.com/ilife/dotmac/

Photocasting, photofeed, tom-ay-to, tom-ah-to, whatever. It’s great to be right! Just send that MacBook Pro my way, Steve.

I don’t know how the implementation works yet (but I hope it works out of the box with Flickr, Pixagogo and SmugMug photofeeds).

Technorati:

  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • email
  • Twitter

Related posts:

  1. Apple creates RSS the Microsoft way When Apple reinvented the photofeed, they actually were a bit...
  2. Apple trailers: when 720p isn’t always 720p One of the best places to look for high-quality movie...
  3. Photofeed: image podcasting As I said in a previous blog post: it’s...
  4. Pimp your laptop: Apple vs Dell Imagine you can walk up to your favourite hardware store...
  5. Podcast for business: authenticated podcatching Podcasting is still in its infancy. A lot of...

2 Responses to “Apple reinvents photocasting in iLife ‘06”


Leave a Reply