<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple reinvents photocasting in iLife &#8216;06</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.forret.com/2006/01/apple-reinvents-photocasting-in-ilife-06/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.forret.com/2006/01/apple-reinvents-photocasting-in-ilife-06/</link>
	<description>and I mean it</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 21:45:03 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blog.forret.com/2006/01/apple-reinvents-photocasting-in-ilife-06/comment-page-1/#comment-363</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2006 02:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peter.smoothouse.com/2006/01/11/apple-reinvents-photocasting-in-ilife-06/#comment-363</guid>
		<description>Publish only for .Mac
Subscribe from any photo RSS feed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Publish only for .Mac<br />
Subscribe from any photo RSS feed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ine</title>
		<link>http://blog.forret.com/2006/01/apple-reinvents-photocasting-in-ilife-06/comment-page-1/#comment-362</link>
		<dc:creator>ine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 03:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peter.smoothouse.com/2006/01/11/apple-reinvents-photocasting-in-ilife-06/#comment-362</guid>
		<description>Implementation only with .mac.. but i guess osme will hack that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Implementation only with .mac.. but i guess osme will hack that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.651 seconds -->
