<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google and Perfect10: DMCA at its best</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.forret.com/2006/06/google-and-perfect10-dmca-at-its-best/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.forret.com/2006/06/google-and-perfect10-dmca-at-its-best/</link>
	<description>and I mean it</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 20:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Adam Penny</title>
		<link>http://blog.forret.com/2006/06/google-and-perfect10-dmca-at-its-best/#comment-16308</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Penny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 13:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.forret.com/2006/06/google-and-perfect10-dmca-at-its-best/#comment-16308</guid>
		<description>I think Google should remove all references to perfect 10 from it's search engine. Google provides them with a very valuable service and if I was in Google's shoes I wouldn't want to publish info where I was at such legal risk. I suspect other companies would be much slower to sue in future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Google should remove all references to perfect 10 from it&#8217;s search engine. Google provides them with a very valuable service and if I was in Google&#8217;s shoes I wouldn&#8217;t want to publish info where I was at such legal risk. I suspect other companies would be much slower to sue in future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.305 seconds -->
