<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google and Perfect10: DMCA at its best</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.forret.com/2006/06/google-and-perfect10-dmca-at-its-best/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.forret.com/2006/06/google-and-perfect10-dmca-at-its-best/</link>
	<description>and I mean it</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 21:45:03 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Adam Penny</title>
		<link>http://blog.forret.com/2006/06/google-and-perfect10-dmca-at-its-best/comment-page-1/#comment-16308</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Penny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 13:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.forret.com/2006/06/google-and-perfect10-dmca-at-its-best/#comment-16308</guid>
		<description>I think Google should remove all references to perfect 10 from it&#039;s search engine. Google provides them with a very valuable service and if I was in Google&#039;s shoes I wouldn&#039;t want to publish info where I was at such legal risk. I suspect other companies would be much slower to sue in future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Google should remove all references to perfect 10 from it&#8217;s search engine. Google provides them with a very valuable service and if I was in Google&#8217;s shoes I wouldn&#8217;t want to publish info where I was at such legal risk. I suspect other companies would be much slower to sue in future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.473 seconds -->
