Comments on: More fun with Myers-Briggs http://blog.forret.com/2006/06/more-fun-with-myers-briggs/ Tango, photography and whatever's bleeding edge Thu, 27 Oct 2011 14:28:42 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4 By: Carlos Felfoldi http://blog.forret.com/2006/06/more-fun-with-myers-briggs/comment-page-1/#comment-517806 Carlos Felfoldi Fri, 29 Oct 2010 02:23:59 +0000 http://blog.forret.com/2006/06/more-fun-with-myers-briggs/#comment-517806 Personally, I have continued to test the same, but do express some concern over reliability as studies have found that between 39% and 76% of those tested fall into different types upon retesting some weeks or years later. INTP Personally, I have continued to test the same, but do express some concern over reliability as studies have found that between 39% and 76% of those tested fall into different types upon retesting some weeks or years later.

INTP

]]> By: Kaj Moroz http://blog.forret.com/2006/06/more-fun-with-myers-briggs/comment-page-1/#comment-488653 Kaj Moroz Sat, 31 Jul 2010 06:17:03 +0000 http://blog.forret.com/2006/06/more-fun-with-myers-briggs/#comment-488653 I believe any two people regardless of MBTI can have a healthy relationship. For example, a ESTP may have a perfectly working relationship with a INFJ, and it would encourage the two of them to strengthen their weaker functions. However certain MBTI relationships will make it a lot easier to communicate naturally. Btw, INTJ here. I believe any two people regardless of MBTI can have a healthy relationship. For example, a ESTP may have a perfectly working relationship with a INFJ, and it would encourage the two of them to strengthen their weaker functions. However certain MBTI relationships will make it a lot easier to communicate naturally.

Btw, INTJ here.

]]> By: Maritsa Darmandzhyan http://blog.forret.com/2006/06/more-fun-with-myers-briggs/comment-page-1/#comment-447312 Maritsa Darmandzhyan Fri, 12 Feb 2010 01:43:40 +0000 http://blog.forret.com/2006/06/more-fun-with-myers-briggs/#comment-447312 Rod Novichkov's method of Visual Identification is very accurate. Rod Novichkov’s method of Visual Identification is very accurate.

]]> By: Ishtar http://blog.forret.com/2006/06/more-fun-with-myers-briggs/comment-page-1/#comment-312512 Ishtar Sun, 19 Oct 2008 05:39:53 +0000 http://blog.forret.com/2006/06/more-fun-with-myers-briggs/#comment-312512 I was looking for some INFJ articles and got this. Very interesting. I'm an INFJ and my brother is an ENFP and we get along perfectly well. I never ever argued with him in my life. We have a deep mutual understanding and connection that shocks even me. I also met an ENTP in the past and he was the most lovable guy I'v ever met. I was looking for some INFJ articles and got this. Very interesting. I’m an INFJ and my brother is an ENFP and we get along perfectly well. I never ever argued with him in my life. We have a deep mutual understanding and connection that shocks even me. I also met an ENTP in the past and he was the most lovable guy I’v ever met.

]]> By: Nicole http://blog.forret.com/2006/06/more-fun-with-myers-briggs/comment-page-1/#comment-274409 Nicole Fri, 25 Jul 2008 03:52:50 +0000 http://blog.forret.com/2006/06/more-fun-with-myers-briggs/#comment-274409 Im an INFJ, and I just found out it's the rarest type. That is kind of cool. I think the ENFP would be the best match for my type, b/c I love listening to crazy stories that come out of people's heads lol. Im an INFJ, and I just found out it’s the rarest type. That is kind of cool. I think the ENFP would be the best match for my type, b/c I love listening to crazy stories that come out of people’s heads lol.

]]> By: Pam http://blog.forret.com/2006/06/more-fun-with-myers-briggs/comment-page-1/#comment-243901 Pam Tue, 20 May 2008 18:01:34 +0000 http://blog.forret.com/2006/06/more-fun-with-myers-briggs/#comment-243901 Hi, Such interesting stuff. Thought I would share that I am a celebrating INFP. My husband (of 17 years, plus 6 of dating), is an ESTJ (yes, I swear). We have six children. I think we balance each other. Were it not for him, I would perpetually live with my head in the clouds. Were it not for me, he wouldn't have a sensitive bone in his body. There is something to be said for reaching out for people that complete us, and create a unified person capable of overcoming just about any obstacle. In this day and age of separate bank accounts and vacations, I realize we are a rarity. But we wouldn't have it any other way. Hi,

Such interesting stuff. Thought I would share that I am a celebrating INFP. My husband (of 17 years, plus 6 of dating), is an ESTJ (yes, I swear). We have six children.

I think we balance each other. Were it not for him, I would perpetually live with my head in the clouds. Were it not for me, he wouldn’t have a sensitive bone in his body.

There is something to be said for reaching out for people that complete us, and create a unified person capable of overcoming just about any obstacle. In this day and age of separate bank accounts and vacations, I realize we are a rarity. But we wouldn’t have it any other way.

]]> By: Nekto http://blog.forret.com/2006/06/more-fun-with-myers-briggs/comment-page-1/#comment-232017 Nekto Sat, 19 Apr 2008 13:10:54 +0000 http://blog.forret.com/2006/06/more-fun-with-myers-briggs/#comment-232017 1) Visual identification - is in main - intuitive identification and can't be only socionics attribute (unofficialy MBTIs use it surely). Socionists use different methods, i.e. - tests, interview etc, VI is not main method of them - only one of methods. Different socionists not rare have different opinions about type of concrete person. Universally recognized school, indisputable guru, procedure of type indentificaton, or a single supervisory organization are absent in socionics. There for, the opinion of www.socionics.com - is not the opinion of "socionics". (P.S. My opinion: type of Sting is probably ENTP, McDowell - ENFJ) 2) If your type is ENFP, then (if types of you and other people are identified right) good types for _intensive, close and long relations_ are: ISTP, ESTJ, ISFP, INTP(it's not bad! whatever who talk), INFJ, ENFP. Bad types for _that kind of relations_ are: ESTP, ISTJ, ENFJ, INFP, ISFJ, ENTJ, INTJ, and in classic ESFJ (I have a doubt in this case). Other are not so bad, but bad for marriage for ex. Intertype relations - is theory (not a fact) based on type modeling of Augustinavichute (Model 'A') and partially on experience of using it. It's not understandable without knowing of Model 'A'. You may look lists of celebrities types and watch your feelings about them in movies, shows etc to try understand intertype relations in practice (if your type is realy ENFP, but not ENTP, or something else). My list of celebritys' types is at socion2.narod.ru - but it's in russian, as almost all information about socionics (there are many books in Internet) - you may use translators (not added MBTI notations at my site, this would help - sequence of types in my list is classic for socionics: 1-ENTP, 2-ISFP, 3-ESFJ, 4-INTJ, 5-ENFJ, 6-ISTJ, 7-ESTP, 8-INFP, 9-ESFP, 10-INTP, 11-ENTJ, 12-ISFJ, 13-ESTJ, 14-INFJ, 15-ENFP, 16-ISTP). 1) Visual identification – is in main – intuitive identification and can’t be only socionics attribute (unofficialy MBTIs use it surely). Socionists use different methods, i.e. – tests, interview etc, VI is not main method of them – only one of methods.
Different socionists not rare have different opinions about type of concrete person. Universally recognized school, indisputable guru, procedure of type indentificaton, or a single supervisory organization are absent in socionics. There for, the opinion of http://www.socionics.com – is not the opinion of “socionics”. (P.S. My opinion: type of Sting is probably ENTP, McDowell – ENFJ)
2) If your type is ENFP, then (if types of you and other people are identified right) good types for _intensive, close and long relations_ are: ISTP, ESTJ, ISFP, INTP(it’s not bad! whatever who talk), INFJ, ENFP. Bad types for _that kind of relations_ are: ESTP, ISTJ, ENFJ, INFP, ISFJ, ENTJ, INTJ, and in classic ESFJ (I have a doubt in this case). Other are not so bad, but bad for marriage for ex.
Intertype relations – is theory (not a fact) based on type modeling of Augustinavichute (Model ‘A’) and partially on experience of using it. It’s not understandable without knowing of Model ‘A’. You may look lists of celebrities types and watch your feelings about them in movies, shows etc to try understand intertype relations in practice (if your type is realy ENFP, but not ENTP, or something else). My list of celebritys’ types is at socion2.narod.ru – but it’s in russian, as almost all information about socionics (there are many books in Internet) – you may use translators (not added MBTI notations at my site, this would help – sequence of types in my list is classic for socionics: 1-ENTP, 2-ISFP, 3-ESFJ, 4-INTJ, 5-ENFJ, 6-ISTJ, 7-ESTP, 8-INFP, 9-ESFP, 10-INTP, 11-ENTJ, 12-ISFJ, 13-ESTJ, 14-INFJ, 15-ENFP, 16-ISTP).

]]> By: Chris http://blog.forret.com/2006/06/more-fun-with-myers-briggs/comment-page-1/#comment-230107 Chris Tue, 15 Apr 2008 10:53:45 +0000 http://blog.forret.com/2006/06/more-fun-with-myers-briggs/#comment-230107 MBTI and socionics are vastly different takes on personality typing...they simply are not compatible in any meaningful way. Thus, your descriptions of conflicting relationships, as well as the population breakdowns will differ based on the system on which you are basing things. I often wish people would stop assigning population breakdowns to 4-letter codes, and instead base them on a persons preferred functions. That is the true path to enlightenment. MBTI and socionics are vastly different takes on personality typing…they simply are not compatible in any meaningful way. Thus, your descriptions of conflicting relationships, as well as the population breakdowns will differ based on the system on which you are basing things. I often wish people would stop assigning population breakdowns to 4-letter codes, and instead base them on a persons preferred functions. That is the true path to enlightenment.

]]> By: Steve Hemm http://blog.forret.com/2006/06/more-fun-with-myers-briggs/comment-page-1/#comment-214020 Steve Hemm Fri, 29 Feb 2008 22:13:04 +0000 http://blog.forret.com/2006/06/more-fun-with-myers-briggs/#comment-214020 Would like to know which of the 16 MBTI types are most prone to dyslexia. I'm an eNtp with very strong N factor & have the gift (& curse) of dyslexia. I believe, dyslexia stems from the N factor based on my experience. What do you think? Would like to know which of the 16 MBTI types are most prone to dyslexia.

I’m an eNtp with very strong N factor & have the gift (& curse) of dyslexia. I believe, dyslexia stems from the N factor based on my experience. What do you think?

]]> By: David Felfoldi http://blog.forret.com/2006/06/more-fun-with-myers-briggs/comment-page-1/#comment-175270 David Felfoldi Tue, 20 Nov 2007 22:04:02 +0000 http://blog.forret.com/2006/06/more-fun-with-myers-briggs/#comment-175270 The reason the mechanic is most search may say less about the MBIT popularity as a whole and more about the type of users who use search (or search that term). The reason the mechanic is most search may say less about the MBIT popularity as a whole and more about the type of users who use search (or search that term).

]]> By: Z http://blog.forret.com/2006/06/more-fun-with-myers-briggs/comment-page-1/#comment-172457 Z Sat, 17 Nov 2007 15:49:44 +0000 http://blog.forret.com/2006/06/more-fun-with-myers-briggs/#comment-172457 Sting either passes as an INTJ or ISTJ. More INTJ cause he is a vry private person by nature and prefers to come up with creative ideas on projects. Who knows though. Sting either passes as an INTJ or ISTJ. More INTJ cause he is a vry private person by nature and prefers to come up with creative ideas on projects. Who knows though.

]]> By: Christina http://blog.forret.com/2006/06/more-fun-with-myers-briggs/comment-page-1/#comment-136351 Christina Sat, 25 Aug 2007 22:15:31 +0000 http://blog.forret.com/2006/06/more-fun-with-myers-briggs/#comment-136351 Aren't you forgetting someting? ENFP's can have realationsips with ENFP's I like you artile, its funny and creative. But, I think your being narrow minded. The ISTP isnt that deep, good luck killing yourself trying to inspire them. Also, I believe that ENFP's just want someone to listen to all the crazy stuff that is comming out of our heads and to be able to add to what we are saying and deepen our understanding of life who would be a better partner than a therapist, THe counselor... the INFP. and the INFJ. INFP's are great. If you want to break it down into a science and your hell bent on the MBTI, theorys, and sociononics (sp?) then yes you are doomed. A lot of balanced NF's get along awsome with other balanced NF's. Dont be so negative, or else you will never find anyone! ;) Christina Aren’t you forgetting someting?

ENFP’s can have realationsips with ENFP’s

I like you artile, its funny and creative.

But, I think your being narrow minded. The ISTP isnt that deep, good luck killing yourself trying to inspire them.

Also, I believe that ENFP’s just want someone to listen to all the crazy stuff that is comming out of our heads and to be able to add to what we are saying and deepen our understanding of life
who would be a better partner than a therapist, THe counselor…
the INFP. and the INFJ.

INFP’s are great.
If you want to break it down into a science and your hell bent on the MBTI, theorys, and sociononics (sp?) then yes you are doomed. A lot of balanced NF’s get along awsome with other balanced NF’s.
Dont be so negative, or else you will never find anyone!
;)

Christina

]]>