<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to upsize an image</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.forret.com/2006/08/how-to-upsize-an-image/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.forret.com/2006/08/how-to-upsize-an-image/</link>
	<description>and I mean it</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 21:45:03 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://blog.forret.com/2006/08/how-to-upsize-an-image/comment-page-1/#comment-182061</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 20:35:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.forret.com/2006/08/how-to-upsize-an-image/#comment-182061</guid>
		<description>the algorithm available at http://reshade.com/ does a pretty decent job at upsizing images in that it tries to preserve the details of the image.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the algorithm available at <a href="http://reshade.com/" rel="nofollow">http://reshade.com/</a> does a pretty decent job at upsizing images in that it tries to preserve the details of the image.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: To upsize a picture, use the B-spline algorithm at blog.forret.com</title>
		<link>http://blog.forret.com/2006/08/how-to-upsize-an-image/comment-page-1/#comment-41361</link>
		<dc:creator>To upsize a picture, use the B-spline algorithm at blog.forret.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 23:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.forret.com/2006/08/how-to-upsize-an-image/#comment-41361</guid>
		<description>[...] If you take a low-res picture, and you want to blow it up to a higher size, there are different algorithms to do the calculation of all those new pixels. I talked about this earlier in &#8220;How to upsize an image&#8220;. I went a bit further now and took a 100&#215;100 pixels detail of a Roos Van Acker picture by Filip Naudts and enlarged it five times: to 500&#215;500. The tool I use, Irfanview, has 6 algorithms to do resize: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] If you take a low-res picture, and you want to blow it up to a higher size, there are different algorithms to do the calculation of all those new pixels. I talked about this earlier in &#8220;How to upsize an image&#8220;. I went a bit further now and took a 100&#215;100 pixels detail of a Roos Van Acker picture by Filip Naudts and enlarged it five times: to 500&#215;500. The tool I use, Irfanview, has 6 algorithms to do resize: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ine</title>
		<link>http://blog.forret.com/2006/08/how-to-upsize-an-image/comment-page-1/#comment-7664</link>
		<dc:creator>ine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2006 21:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.forret.com/2006/08/how-to-upsize-an-image/#comment-7664</guid>
		<description>way back when photoshop was still 5.5 and digital cams of 5 mpixel were the best of the best, there was one general rule:
enlarge your file in photshop by 110percent.
When you take steps of 110, the interpolation is best and quality loss minimum.


Don&#039;t ask me why, it probably had something to do with the algorytm.
But it was something everybody did when working for a pressagency.
*110 *110 *110 ...
There was one good plugin for photoshop. But I forgot its name...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>way back when photoshop was still 5.5 and digital cams of 5 mpixel were the best of the best, there was one general rule:<br />
enlarge your file in photshop by 110percent.<br />
When you take steps of 110, the interpolation is best and quality loss minimum.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t ask me why, it probably had something to do with the algorytm.<br />
But it was something everybody did when working for a pressagency.<br />
*110 *110 *110 &#8230;<br />
There was one good plugin for photoshop. But I forgot its name&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.621 seconds -->
