<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iPod in 2009: more storage or bandwidth?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.forret.com/2006/08/ipod-in-2009-more-storage-or-bandwidth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.forret.com/2006/08/ipod-in-2009-more-storage-or-bandwidth/</link>
	<description>and I mean it</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 21:45:03 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: kashin</title>
		<link>http://blog.forret.com/2006/08/ipod-in-2009-more-storage-or-bandwidth/comment-page-1/#comment-253807</link>
		<dc:creator>kashin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 19:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.forret.com/2006/08/ipod-in-2009-more-storage-or-bandwidth/#comment-253807</guid>
		<description>Hi!

That was some interesting peice of information. I am working on an book about the varying trends across decades in the entertainment industry and I believe that your page could support my work. So, I would want to refer to your page. I hope that is okay with you. 

Appreciate your help.

Regards,
Kashin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi!</p>
<p>That was some interesting peice of information. I am working on an book about the varying trends across decades in the entertainment industry and I believe that your page could support my work. So, I would want to refer to your page. I hope that is okay with you. </p>
<p>Appreciate your help.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Kashin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MagicianXV</title>
		<link>http://blog.forret.com/2006/08/ipod-in-2009-more-storage-or-bandwidth/comment-page-1/#comment-248555</link>
		<dc:creator>MagicianXV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 17:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.forret.com/2006/08/ipod-in-2009-more-storage-or-bandwidth/#comment-248555</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t see Apple releasing any model of iPod with interchangeable cards, even if doing so would enable extensive and versatile storage. It just doesn&#039;t seem to mesh with the sleek, self-contained image that we&#039;ve all come to associate with the iPod. Possibly a more robust system of management through iTunes, but nothing that we would physically manipulate. It&#039;s just not stylish enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t see Apple releasing any model of iPod with interchangeable cards, even if doing so would enable extensive and versatile storage. It just doesn&#8217;t seem to mesh with the sleek, self-contained image that we&#8217;ve all come to associate with the iPod. Possibly a more robust system of management through iTunes, but nothing that we would physically manipulate. It&#8217;s just not stylish enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dude</title>
		<link>http://blog.forret.com/2006/08/ipod-in-2009-more-storage-or-bandwidth/comment-page-1/#comment-213170</link>
		<dc:creator>dude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 18:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.forret.com/2006/08/ipod-in-2009-more-storage-or-bandwidth/#comment-213170</guid>
		<description>dude you lost i think
ipod got bluetooth, wifi(iphone, itouch)
heck 1TB HDD???
man do you know how big is it?
and how much it takes?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dude you lost i think<br />
ipod got bluetooth, wifi(iphone, itouch)<br />
heck 1TB HDD???<br />
man do you know how big is it?<br />
and how much it takes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brunoodb</title>
		<link>http://blog.forret.com/2006/08/ipod-in-2009-more-storage-or-bandwidth/comment-page-1/#comment-7517</link>
		<dc:creator>brunoodb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 22:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.forret.com/2006/08/ipod-in-2009-more-storage-or-bandwidth/#comment-7517</guid>
		<description>oeps.
i tend to indeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oeps.<br />
i tend to indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pascal Van Hecke</title>
		<link>http://blog.forret.com/2006/08/ipod-in-2009-more-storage-or-bandwidth/comment-page-1/#comment-7514</link>
		<dc:creator>Pascal Van Hecke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 21:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.forret.com/2006/08/ipod-in-2009-more-storage-or-bandwidth/#comment-7514</guid>
		<description>Bruno: One year from now?
Peter: Three years from now (2009)?

People tend to overestimate short-term progress (and underestimate long-term progress), I think you&#039;re doing that here as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bruno: One year from now?<br />
Peter: Three years from now (2009)?</p>
<p>People tend to overestimate short-term progress (and underestimate long-term progress), I think you&#8217;re doing that here as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brunoodb</title>
		<link>http://blog.forret.com/2006/08/ipod-in-2009-more-storage-or-bandwidth/comment-page-1/#comment-7072</link>
		<dc:creator>brunoodb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 23:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.forret.com/2006/08/ipod-in-2009-more-storage-or-bandwidth/#comment-7072</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;I think the storage scenario is more realistic. There are no technical barriers to either scenario, but I think the bandwidth scenario will not be economically viable for a longer time. The mobile operators (Vodaphone, Cingular) are used to charging for every byte of information, they will not allow an environment where everyone can afford to download everything, all-the-time, non-stop. They will keep that expensive.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;
--&gt; so, forret, our discussion on sunday did not convince you?
let&#039;s wait and see. 1 year from now, and the winner gets a beer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;I think the storage scenario is more realistic. There are no technical barriers to either scenario, but I think the bandwidth scenario will not be economically viable for a longer time. The mobile operators (Vodaphone, Cingular) are used to charging for every byte of information, they will not allow an environment where everyone can afford to download everything, all-the-time, non-stop. They will keep that expensive.&#8221;</i><br />
&#8211;&gt; so, forret, our discussion on sunday did not convince you?<br />
let&#8217;s wait and see. 1 year from now, and the winner gets a beer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.889 seconds -->
