<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Newscorp is indeed dropping out of Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.forret.com/2009/12/newscorp-is-indeed-dropping-out-of-google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.forret.com/2009/12/newscorp-is-indeed-dropping-out-of-google/</link>
	<description>Tango, photography and whatever&#039;s bleeding edge</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 14:28:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://blog.forret.com/2009/12/newscorp-is-indeed-dropping-out-of-google/comment-page-1/#comment-420611</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 09:03:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.forret.com/?p=1147#comment-420611</guid>
		<description>@Matt: I have made a comparison between the numbers coming back from the API and the &#039;normal&#039; website:
http://tools.forret.com/newscorp/reference.php

For a few web sites (e.g. Yahoo!) the numbers are the same. For most of them they are hugely different.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Matt: I have made a comparison between the numbers coming back from the API and the &#8216;normal&#8217; website:<br />
<a href="http://tools.forret.com/newscorp/reference.php" rel="nofollow">http://tools.forret.com/newscorp/reference.php</a></p>
<p>For a few web sites (e.g. Yahoo!) the numbers are the same. For most of them they are hugely different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ferodynamics</title>
		<link>http://blog.forret.com/2009/12/newscorp-is-indeed-dropping-out-of-google/comment-page-1/#comment-420568</link>
		<dc:creator>Ferodynamics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 23:08:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.forret.com/?p=1147#comment-420568</guid>
		<description>the estimatedResultCount is “a rough estimate and is not
reliable enough to be used for research/exact calculations. It is subject to frequent change as our index changes.”

http://ferodynamics.com/google-delists-myspace/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the estimatedResultCount is “a rough estimate and is not<br />
reliable enough to be used for research/exact calculations. It is subject to frequent change as our index changes.”</p>
<p><a href="http://ferodynamics.com/google-delists-myspace/" rel="nofollow">http://ferodynamics.com/google-delists-myspace/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Cutts</title>
		<link>http://blog.forret.com/2009/12/newscorp-is-indeed-dropping-out-of-google/comment-page-1/#comment-420561</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Cutts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 22:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.forret.com/?p=1147#comment-420561</guid>
		<description>A few of us at the Googleplex are checking this out and not seeing anything very unusual on our end (search results estimates are just that--estimates). As Paul Lomax asked, what sort of control sample are you using of regular sites?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few of us at the Googleplex are checking this out and not seeing anything very unusual on our end (search results estimates are just that&#8211;estimates). As Paul Lomax asked, what sort of control sample are you using of regular sites?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Akerson</title>
		<link>http://blog.forret.com/2009/12/newscorp-is-indeed-dropping-out-of-google/comment-page-1/#comment-420546</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Akerson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 18:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.forret.com/?p=1147#comment-420546</guid>
		<description>Interesting chart - going from 192m to 12m is significant. I wonder how difficult it is going to be to do the necessary work when they decide to go in the opposite direction...  

This decision is going to simultaneously destroy and create careers -  and further, at some point the careers that the decision creates (in the beginning) will ultimately be destroyed when the decision is ultimately reversed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting chart &#8211; going from 192m to 12m is significant. I wonder how difficult it is going to be to do the necessary work when they decide to go in the opposite direction&#8230;  </p>
<p>This decision is going to simultaneously destroy and create careers &#8211;  and further, at some point the careers that the decision creates (in the beginning) will ultimately be destroyed when the decision is ultimately reversed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Lomax</title>
		<link>http://blog.forret.com/2009/12/newscorp-is-indeed-dropping-out-of-google/comment-page-1/#comment-420545</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Lomax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 18:11:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.forret.com/?p=1147#comment-420545</guid>
		<description>Could this have anything to do with it..?
http://www.seomoz.org/blog/googles-indexation-cap

Have you been monitoring any non-Newscorp sites a &quot;control&quot; sample, to make sure it&#039;s not just a new algorithm from Google?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could this have anything to do with it..?<br />
<a href="http://www.seomoz.org/blog/googles-indexation-cap" rel="nofollow">http://www.seomoz.org/blog/googles-indexation-cap</a></p>
<p>Have you been monitoring any non-Newscorp sites a &#8220;control&#8221; sample, to make sure it&#8217;s not just a new algorithm from Google?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://blog.forret.com/2009/12/newscorp-is-indeed-dropping-out-of-google/comment-page-1/#comment-420540</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 17:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.forret.com/?p=1147#comment-420540</guid>
		<description>It might be a bug in the Google Search API results. But the graph is not fake.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It might be a bug in the Google Search API results. But the graph is not fake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TOMHTML</title>
		<link>http://blog.forret.com/2009/12/newscorp-is-indeed-dropping-out-of-google/comment-page-1/#comment-420538</link>
		<dc:creator>TOMHTML</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 17:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.forret.com/?p=1147#comment-420538</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a fake graph, or a bug.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a fake graph, or a bug.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Newscorp is indeed dropping out of Google &#124; blog.forret.com -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://blog.forret.com/2009/12/newscorp-is-indeed-dropping-out-of-google/comment-page-1/#comment-420535</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Newscorp is indeed dropping out of Google &#124; blog.forret.com -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 17:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.forret.com/?p=1147#comment-420535</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Francois and Peter Forret, Peter Forret. Peter Forret said: Newscorp is indeed dropping out of Google - http://blog.forret.com/2009/12/newscorp-is-indeed-dropping-out-of-google/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Francois and Peter Forret, Peter Forret. Peter Forret said: Newscorp is indeed dropping out of Google &#8211; <a href="http://blog.forret.com/2009/12/newscorp-is-indeed-dropping-out-of-google/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.forret.com/2009/12/newscorp-is-indeed-dropping-out-of-google/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.541 seconds -->

