<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Focal length for the common man: &#8220;portrait distance&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.forret.com/2010/02/focal-length-for-the-common-man-portrait-distance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.forret.com/2010/02/focal-length-for-the-common-man-portrait-distance/</link>
	<description>Tango, photography and whatever&#039;s bleeding edge</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 14:28:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://blog.forret.com/2010/02/focal-length-for-the-common-man-portrait-distance/comment-page-1/#comment-488692</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 10:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.forret.com/?p=1156#comment-488692</guid>
		<description>The depth of field would be different.
Check with http://www.hdslr-cinema.com/tools/dof.php

Imagine you take a picture of someone at 4m distance, with aperture f/2.8
1) with a 70mm lens you get a depth of field of 54cm. If you crop to have only the face: still 54cm. So the whole face (eyes, ears, hair) will probably be sharp.
2) with a 200mm lens, you get a depth of field of 6cm. So if the eyes are in focus, the ears might already be blurry a bit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The depth of field would be different.<br />
Check with <a href="http://www.hdslr-cinema.com/tools/dof.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.hdslr-cinema.com/tools/dof.php</a></p>
<p>Imagine you take a picture of someone at 4m distance, with aperture f/2.8<br />
1) with a 70mm lens you get a depth of field of 54cm. If you crop to have only the face: still 54cm. So the whole face (eyes, ears, hair) will probably be sharp.<br />
2) with a 200mm lens, you get a depth of field of 6cm. So if the eyes are in focus, the ears might already be blurry a bit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://blog.forret.com/2010/02/focal-length-for-the-common-man-portrait-distance/comment-page-1/#comment-488685</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 09:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.forret.com/?p=1156#comment-488685</guid>
		<description>Peter, a related question: 
Basically with 18MP+ you could just crop the image to portrait &quot;size&quot;; does the focal length affect the image in any other way, too? Or is it just the &quot;detail&quot; that you would lose?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter, a related question:<br />
Basically with 18MP+ you could just crop the image to portrait &#8220;size&#8221;; does the focal length affect the image in any other way, too? Or is it just the &#8220;detail&#8221; that you would lose?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bookmarks for April 26th through April 27th &#124; dekay.org</title>
		<link>http://blog.forret.com/2010/02/focal-length-for-the-common-man-portrait-distance/comment-page-1/#comment-466448</link>
		<dc:creator>Bookmarks for April 26th through April 27th &#124; dekay.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 11:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.forret.com/?p=1156#comment-466448</guid>
		<description>[...] Focal length for the common man: &#8220;portrait distance&#8221; &#124; blog.forret.com&#160;&#8211; (tags: focal length Photography ) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Focal length for the common man: &ldquo;portrait distance&rdquo; | blog.forret.com&#160;&#8211; (tags: focal length Photography ) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Focal length for the common man: “portrait distance” &#124; blog.forret.com -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://blog.forret.com/2010/02/focal-length-for-the-common-man-portrait-distance/comment-page-1/#comment-446167</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Focal length for the common man: “portrait distance” &#124; blog.forret.com -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 13:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.forret.com/?p=1156#comment-446167</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Alex Deforce, binarycamera. binarycamera said: Focal length for the common man: a oeportrait distancea: I remember that before I started photography on a serious... http://bit.ly/9er4xD [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Alex Deforce, binarycamera. binarycamera said: Focal length for the common man: a oeportrait distancea: I remember that before I started photography on a serious&#8230; <a href="http://bit.ly/9er4xD" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/9er4xD</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.727 seconds -->

